Degree of comparison
From Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
In English grammar, the degree of comparison of an
adjective or adverb describes the relational value of one thing with
something in another clause of a sentence. An adjective may simply describe a
quality, (the positive); it may compare the quality with that of another
of its kind (comparative
degree); and it may compare the quality with many or all others (superlative degree). In other languages it may
describe a very large degree of a particular quality (in Semitic linguistics,
called an elative).
The degree of comparison may be expressed morphologically
or syntactically. In English, for example,
most monosyllabic and some disyllabic adjectives have morphological
degrees of comparison: green (positive), greener (comparative), greenest
(superlative); pretty, prettier, prettiest; while most
polysyllabic adjectives use syntax: complex, more complex, most
complex.
- The positive degree is the most basic form of the adjective, positive because it does not relate to any superior or inferior qualities of other things in speech.
- The comparative degree denotes a greater amount of a quality relative to something else. The phrase “Anna is taller than her father” means that Anna's degree of tallness is greater than her father's degree of tallness.
- The superlative degree denotes the most, the largest, etc., by which it differs from other things.
Rhetorical use of unbalanced comparatives
In some contexts, such as advertising or political
speeches, absolute and relative comparatives are intentionally employed in a
way that invites a comparison, and yet the basis of comparison is not
established. This is a common rhetorical device
used to create an implication of significance where one may not actually be
present. Although such usage is common, it is sometimes considered
ungrammatical
For example:
- Always!
- Why pay more?
- We work harder.
- We sell for less!
English usage
Traditional English grammar uses the comparative form
when comparing exactly two things, and the superlative when comparing three or
more, but in informal usage this may not hold. For instance, the phrase
"May the best man win" may be used even when there are only two
individuals competing; in traditional usage the correct phrase when there are
two contestants would be "May the better man win".
Positive
|
Comparative
|
Superlative
|
Good
|
Better
|
Best
|
Beautiful
|
More Beautiful
|
Most Beautiful
|
Big
|
Bigger
|
Biggest
|
Tall
|
Taller
|
Tallest
|
Sincere
|
More Sincere
|
Most Sincere
|
Small
|
Smaller
|
Smallest
|
Comparison (grammar)
From Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
See also: Comparison of adjectives and
Comparative
Comparison, in grammar, is a property
of adjectives and adverbs in most languages; it describes systems that
distinguish the degree to which the modifier modifies its complement.
English, due
to the complex etymology of its lexicon, has two parallel systems of
comparison. One involves the suffixes -er (the
"comparative") and -est (the
"superlative"). These inflections are
of Germanic
origin, and are cognate with the Latin
suffixes -ior and -issimus. They are typically added to shorter
words, words of Anglo-Saxon
origin, and borrowed words that have been fully assimilated into the English
vocabulary. Usually the words that take these inflections have fewer than three
syllables. This system contains a number of irregular forms, some of which,
like good, better, best, contain suppletive forms. These irregular forms
include:
Positive
|
Comparative
|
Superlative
|
good
|
better
|
best
|
well
|
better
|
best
|
bad
|
worse
|
worst
|
far
|
farther
|
farthest
|
far
|
further
|
furthest
|
little
|
smaller, less(er)
|
smallest, least
|
many, much
|
more
|
most
|
more and most
The second system of comparison in English appends the grammatical
particles more and most, themselves the irregular
comparatives of many, to the adjective or adverb being modified. This
series can be compared to a system containing the diminutives less and least.
This system is most commonly used with words of French or Latin
derivation; adjectives and adverbs formed with suffixes other than -ly
(e.g. beautiful); and with longer, technical, or infrequently used
words. Knowing which words fall into which system is a highly idiomatic issue
in English syntax. Some words require the suffixing
system: e.g. taller is required; *more tall is not idiomatic
English.
Some words (e.g. difficult) require more
and most. Some words (e.g. polite) can be used with either
system; curiously, while polite can go either way, the derived word impolite
requires more and most.
The general rule is that words with one syllable require the suffix, words with
three or more syllables require more or most and words with two
syllables can go either way.
Absolute adjectives
A perennial issue in English usage involves the comparison of
so-called "absolute" adjectives,
adjectives that logically do not seem to admit of comparison. There are many
such adjectives — generally adjectives that name qualities that are either present
or absent: nothing is *"more Cretaceous" or *"more
igneous" than anything else.
Other examples include perfect, unique, and
parallel, which name qualities that are inherently superlative: if
something is perfect, there can be nothing better, so it does not make sense to
describe one thing as *"more perfect" than something else; if
something is unique, it is one of a kind, so something cannot be *"very
unique", or *"more unique" than something else. See also tautology
(rhetoric) and pleonasm.
In general, terms like perfect and parallel
cannot ever apply exactly to things in real life, so they are commonly
used to mean nearly perfect, nearly parallel, and so on; and in
this (inexact) use, more perfect (i.e., more nearly perfect, closer to
perfect) and more parallel (i.e., more nearly parallel, closer to
parallel) do seem to make sense.